To begin with, I'm no staff member just an ordinary RTMM users and it might not be my business, but sometimes I wonder...
What I'm writing now might be a provoking statement, but that's how it's intended and might stimulate thoughts.
A frank word and clear speech is allowed I suppose.
Repeatedly I read this and other postings with similar content :
Steve Downing and I are wondering if people are using the Medical Facilities Page. We see many hits on the page and lots of downloads, but we are not getting a lot of discussion, it would be interesting to see what people are thinking. Let us know.
Reading between the lines, I interpret this as a „hidden call for support".
Designers what to know from their users if their products meet users' taste.
Doug Linn and Steve Downing are offering the excellent MedEvacs work again and again in the forum but RTMM user's response is rather poorly as if they are offering "Sauerbier" (sour beer). This is a German idiom, can't be translated but the meaning is like "chopped liver" or "a non seller", just like "of little value".
This broad hint caused me to write some personnel reflections about our RTMM home.
RTMM has about 900 listed subscribers.
More than 300 never ever wrote any single word in the forum!
Are these "zero-writers" just software hunters and gatherers or they might be called "scenery junkies", only joining in for downloading sceneries?
RTMM doesn't need them, why not deleting them from the list?
How many of the remaining 600 ever said "hello" in >> Hi, I'm new! << . I didn't count but my guess is less than 100.
Normally it's a cause of decency to introduce oneself when entering a forum to become a member.
This is a significant guesture of good manners and politeness and at least an easy doing what everybody can do before downloading sceneries here.
- How many users take place is the everday forum business?
A user's request for help is easily done and fortunately we've got very experienced users who lend support to get user problems fixed.
But what about joining discussions, bringing in new ideas, proposals, saying "thank you" for getting many well done FREEWARE sceneries. And many of these have payware character!
May I bring in mind how many uncountless working hours are necessary to create a large area scenery:
That begins with time-consuming search of a suitable site, then laying the ground (often as photo textures) and finally setting suitable objects.
Oh boy, not finished yet, RTMM has a QC (quality control) to adjust all delivered sceneries to be compatible with FSX and P3D.
And this often includes a lot of new problems combined with additional work.
Designers are not sitting next door to each other. That means an additional exchange of many emails and then finally when the new product is "bug-free" it will be published.
This forum only lives on a participation of its members.
The number of really interested and active RTMM enthusiasts is not high. The amount is limited maybe to 30-40 persons ( this is estimated, I might be corrected)(staff members excluded)
User names who are attending the forum on a regular basis, writing postings are always the same ones.
Fortunately we see some new "faces" entering our place bringing in a breath of fresh air.
You are right, when argueing that's the problem of every forum.
Even Orbx with about 33.000 enlisted subscribers suffers from this.
The permanent reader recognizes immediately that active names/regular posters also at Orbx are always the same ones and this is an amount of much less than 5%.
Back to us with other questions:
- How many RTMM members have ever visited all RTMM sceneries?
I bet, besides staff personnel most likely less than 20%.
- How many RTMM members have already flown some of the new rescue flight operations named "RTMM MedEvac"?
Does Doug's new idea attract users' interest?
RTMM is offering high quality sceneries in a huge amount. That is something we have to be aware of much more.
It's a pity that many areas/sceneries haven't been visited ever because we even don't know about them or because of not going into the trouble of reading the forum carefully, or they have been ignored actually.
There are sceneries that where never commented. How does the designer know if he met users' taste?
Isn't this already a sign of being scenery overfed?
Perhaps you might argue, I shouldn't lean too far out of the window because I'm not a frequent writer, too. Right, but basically a bit more of interest and activity from all of us will inspire and stimulate our designers to continue their selfless work, always having in mind that there are users who support their work and recognize their performance.
Sorry, no harm meant, I was just thinking loud.
Keep our RTMM and our forum alive!
Dieter